Reducing the Environmental Impact of Digital Health: Development of an Ecoscore for Health Apps.

The digital revolution is perceived as minimizing the environmental impact of human activities. However, digital actually uses real physical equipment, that consumes natural resources and emits greenhouse gases. The French Ministry of health has very soon engaged in the development of an ethical digital health with a strong concern for eco-responsibility. We have developed an Ecoscore service to allow providers of web and mobile health apps to calculate the environmental impact of their apps. The ecoscore is computed on a script describing the canonical use of the app. It is based on parameters actually measured, data flow (data downloaded from datacenters), performance (time taken to display the result of an action), and energy consumption (battery discharge rate). The French Ministry of Health has made the ecoscore mandatory to software providers candidating to the service catalog of Mon espace santé, a digital health space offered to all French citizens.

Implementation of Digital Health Ethics: A First Step with the Adoption of 16 European Ethical Principles for Digital Health.

The potential for technology to transform health care is tremendous, but advances in digital health may also bring privacy and data security challenges that may exacerbate inequalities. Hence, it is critical that the development of digital health is included in a framework of humanistic and ethical values. France drew up its roadmap for accelerating the shift towards digital health with ethics at the forefront, along with security and interoperability pillars. Criteria such as digital health for all, transparency of data processing, trustworthy AI, and eco-responsibility and sustainability of digital health were elaborated. Under the French Presidency of the Council of the European Union, building on the proposal of ethical criteria from France, eHealth network representatives unanimously adopted 16 European ethical principles for digital health, formalizing trust commitments towards European citizens and paving the way for the European Health Data Space.

Clinical Decision Support Systems Applied to the Management of Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, and its burden has been rising over the past decades. A significant advance in healthcare is the integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) into medical practice, which support healthcare professionals improving clinical decisions, leading to recommended patient-specific treatments and enhanced patient care. Breast cancer CDSSs are thus currently expanding, whether applied to screening, diagnostic, therapeutic or follow-up tasks. We conducted a scoping review to study their availability and use in practice. Except risk calculators, very few CDSSs are currently routinely used.

Developing a Comprehensive Search Strategy for the Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Nursing Practice.

The search strategy of a literature review is of utmost importance as it impacts the validity of its findings. In order to build the best query to guide the literature search on clinical decision support systems applied to nursing clinical practice, we developed an iterative process capitalizing on previous systematic reviews published on similar topics. Three reviews were analyzed relatively to their detection performance. Errors in the choice of keywords and terms used in title and abstract (missing MeSH terms, failure to use common terms), may make relevant articles invisible.

Methods Used to Compare Narrative Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Scoping Review.

Guideline-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) need the most recent evidence for reliable performance, making the provision of regularly updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) a major issue. Some international guidelines are renewed in short intervals and can be used for checking the status of given national guidelines with regard to the most recent evidence. Considering the volume of medical data and the number of CPGs published, computerized comparison of clinical guidelines can be an effective method. We performed a scoping review to evaluate the methods used for comparing two CPGs. We searched for methods for extracting CPG components and for methods used for comparing CPGs at different levels of abstraction. In each case, computerized and semi-computerized methods were recognized. Expert knowledge has yet a determinant role for assessing the comparisons, this role being more prominent for the extraction of semantic rules and the resolution of inconsistencies.

Comparison of MetaMap, cTAKES, SIFR, and ECMT to Annotate Breast Cancer Patient Summaries.

Most clinical texts including breast cancer patient summaries (BCPSs) are elaborated as narrative documents difficult to process by decision support systems. Annotators have been developed to extract the relevant content of such documents, e.g., MetaMap and cTAKES, that work with the English language and perform concept mapping using UMLS, SIFR and ECMT, that work for the French language and provide concepts using various terminologies. We compared the four annotators on a sample of 25 French BCPSs, pre-processed to manage acronyms and translated in English. We observed that MetaMap extracted the largest number of UMLS concepts (15,458), followed by SIFR (3,784), ECMT (1,962), and cTAKES (1,769). Each annotator extracted specific valuable information, not proposed by the other annotators. Considered as complementary, all annotators should be used in sequence to optimize the results.

Using Machine Learning on Imbalanced Guideline Compliance Data to Optimize Multidisciplinary Tumour Board Decision Making for the Management of Breast Cancer Patients.

Complex breast cancer cases that need further multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) discussions should have priority in the organization of MTBs. In order to optimize MTB workflow, we attempted to predict complex cases defined as non-compliant cases despite the use of the decision support system OncoDoc, through the implementation of machine learning procedures and algorithms (Decision Trees, Random Forests, and XGBoost). F1-score after cross-validation, sampling implementation, with or without feature selection, did not exceed 40%.

Are People Ready to Report Digital Health Ethical Issues in Order to Contribute to Their Resolution?

Although guaranteed by the GDPR, transparency of health data processing may not be fully respected, leading citizens to mistrust eHealth and discard digital health services. Identifying and safeguarding ethics in eHealth services is thus important to promote their development. We conducted a survey to assess the extent of ethical issues induced by the use of digital health services, understand the efforts citizens would be willing to accept for reporting such issues, and evaluate citizens' expectations regarding this reporting. Among 200 respondents, 36% reported having encountered ethical issues with the processing of their health data or with digital health services being poorly inclusive. Faced to ethical issues when using a digital health service, 49% of respondents were rather or very angry, and 33% felt rather or very dependent. Most respondents were ready to report digital health ethical issues if there is a feedback for each report.

Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods to Predict the Complexity of Breast Cancer Cases.

In many countries, the management of cancer patients must be discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). These meetings have been introduced to provide a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to cancer care. However, the benefits of MTBs are now being challenged because there are a lot of cases and not enough time to discuss all the of them. During the evaluation of the guideline-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) of the DESIREE project, we found that for some clinical cases, the system did not produce recommendations. We assumed that these cases were complex clinical cases and needed deeper MTB discussions. In this work, we trained and tested several machine learning and deep learning algorithms on a labelled sample of 298 breast cancer patient summaries, to predict the complexity of a breast cancer clinical case. XGboost and multi-layer perceptron were the models with the best result, with an F1 score of 83%.

ABiMed: Towards an Innovative Clinical Decision Support System for Medication Reviews and Polypharmacy Management.

Polypharmacy in elderly is a public health problem with both clinical (increase of adverse drug events) and economic issues. One solution is medication review, a structured assessment of patients' drug orders by the pharmacist for optimizing the therapy. However, this task is tedious, cognitively complex and error-prone, and only a few clinical decision support systems have been proposed for supporting it. Existing systems are either rule-based systems implementing guidelines, or documentary systems presenting drug knowledge. In this paper, we present the ABiMed research project, and, through literature reviews and brainstorming, we identified five candidate innovations for a decision support system for medication review: patient data transfer from GP to pharmacists, use of semantic technologies, association of rule-based and documentary approaches, use of machine learning, and a two-way discussion between pharmacist and GP after the medication review.

Deep Learning, a Not so Magical Problem Solver: A Case Study with Predicting the Complexity of Breast Cancer Cases.

Using guideline-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) has improved clinical practice, especially during multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs) in cancer patient management. However, MTBs have been reported to be overcrowded, with limited time to discuss all cases. Complex breast cancer cases that need further MTB discussions should have priority in the organization of MTBs. In order to optimize MTB workflow, we attempted to predict complex cases defined as non-compliant cases despite the use of the decision support system OncoDoc. After previously obtaining insufficient performance with machine learning algorithms, we tested Multi Layer Perceptron for classification, compared various samplers to compensate data imbalance combined with cross- validation, and optimized all models with hyperparameter tuning and feature selection with no improvement and lacklustre results (F1-score: 31.4%).

Are Semantic Annotators Able to Extract Relevant Complexity-Related Concepts from Clinical Notes?

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) implementing cancer clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have the potential to improve the compliance of decisions made by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) with CPGs. However, guideline-based CDSSs do not cover complex cases and need time for discussion. We propose to learn how to predict complex cancer cases prior to MTBs from breast cancer patient summaries (BCPSs) resuming clinical notes. BCPSs being unstructured natural language textual documents, we implemented four semantic annotators (ECMT, SIFR, cTAKES, and MetaMap) to assess whether complexity-related concepts could be extracted from clinical notes. On a sample of 24 BCPSs covering 35 complexity reasons, ECMT and MetaMap were the most efficient systems with a performance rate of 60% (21/35) and 49% (17/35), respectively. When using the four annotators in sequence, 69% of complexity reasons were extracted (24/35 reasons).

Health Data, Information, and Knowledge Sharing for Addressing the COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To introduce the 2021 International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook by the editors. METHODS: The editorial provides an introduction and overview to the 2021 IMIA Yearbook whose special topic is "Managing Pandemics with Health Informatics - Successes and Challenges". The Special Topic, the keynote paper, and survey papers are discussed. The IMIA President's statement and the IMIA dialogue with the World Health Organization are introduced. The sections' changes in the Yearbook Editorial Committee are also described. RESULTS: Health informatics, in the context of a global pandemic, led to the development of ways to collect, standardize, disseminate and reuse data worldwide: public health data but also information from social networks and scientific literature. Fact checking methods were mostly based on artificial intelligence and natural language processing. The pandemic also introduced new challenges for telehealth support in times of critical response. Next generation sequencing in bioinformatics helped in decoding the sequence of the virus and the development of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shows the need for timely, reliable, open, and globally available information to support decision making and efficiently control outbreaks. Applying Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) requirements for data is a key success factor while challenging ethical issues have to be considered.

Reusing Decisions Made with One Decision Support System to Assess a Second Decision Support System: Introducing the Notion of Complex Cases.

The guideline-based decision support system (GL-DSS) of the DESIREE project and OncoDoc are two clinical decision support systems applied to the management of breast cancer. In order to evaluate the DESIREE GL-DSS, we decided to reuse a sample of clinical cases previously resolved by the multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) of the Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) when using OncoDoc. Since we had two different knowledge representation models to represent clinical parameters and decisions, and two formalisms to represent guidelines, we developed a transformation sequence, involving the creation of synthetic patients, the enrichment of DESIREE ontology, and the translation of clinical cases and their decisions, to transform OncoDoc data into the DESIREE representation. Considering MTB decisions as the gold standard, the 84% compliance rate of DESIREE recommendations was rather satisfactory. Some situations (0.7%) concerned clinical cases that were compliant neither with OncoDoc nor with DESIREE that we defined as complex cases, not handled by guidelines, which necessitate effective MTB discussions.

Users' Assessement of the Visualization with Gauges of a Guideline-Based Decision Support System Output: A Qualitative Study of Focus Groups.

Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) are still poorly routinely implemented in clinical practices mainly because of usability problems related to the technology interface. We previously proposed to use gauges to visualize the output of a guideline-based CDSS applied to malnutrition and pressure ulcer management in nursing homes. This interface was assessed by four focus groups including 16 healthcare professionals with expertise in geriatrics. A USE-like questionnaire was distributed. Participants considered the dashboard-with-gauges visualization was useful (94%), easy to use (63%), easy to learn (88%), and 88% thought they could be satisfied with it. However, concerns were expressed about the difficulty to follow up multiple healthcare problems.

Computerized Decision Support Systems for Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the research literature describing the outcomes of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) implemented in nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Search of relevant articles published in the English language between January 1, 2000, and February 29, 2020, in the Medline database. The quality of the selected studies was assessed according to PRISMA guidelines and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: From 1828 articles retrieved, 24 studies were selected for review, among which only 6 were randomized controlled trials. Although clinical outcomes are seldom studied, some studies show that CDSSs have the potential to decrease pressure ulcer incidence and malnutrition prevalence. Improvement of process outcomes such as increased compliance with practice guidelines, better documentation of nursing assessment, improved teamwork and communication, and cost saving, also are reported. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, the use of CDSSs in NHs may be effective to improve patient clinical outcomes and health care delivery; however, most of the retrieved studies were observational studies, which significantly weakens the evidence. High-quality studies are needed to investigate CDSS effects and limitations in NHs.

Visualization of Guideline-Based Decision Support for the Management of Pressure Ulcers in Nursing Homes.

Though a preventable risk, the management of pressure ulcers (PUs) in nursing homes is not satisfactory due to inadequate prevention and complex care plans. PUs early detection and wound assessment require to know the patient condition and risk factors and to have a good knowledge of best practices. We built a guideline-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the prevention, the assessment, and the management of PUs. Clinical practice guidelines have been modeled as decision trees and formalized as IF-THEN rules to be triggered by electronic health record (EHR) data. From PU assessment yielded by the CDSS, we propose a synthetic visualization of PU current and previous stages as a gauge that illustrates the different stages of PU continuous evolution. This allows to display PU current and previous stages to inform health care professionals of PU updated assessment and support their evaluation of previously delivered care efficiency. The CDSS will be integrated in NETSoins nursing homes EHR where gauges for several health problems constitute a patient dashboard.

From Atomic Guideline-Based Recommendations to Complete Therapeutic Care Plans: A Knowledge-Based Approach Applied to Breast Cancer Management.

How textual clinical practice guidelines are written may have an impact on how they are formalized and on the kind of recommendations issued by the clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that implement them. Breast cancer guidelines are mostly centered on the description of the different recommended therapeutic modalities, represented as atomic recommendations, but seldom provide comprehensive plans that drive care delivery. The objective of this work is to implement a knowledge-based approach to develop a care plan builder (CPB) that works on atomic recommendations to build patient-centered care plans as sequences of chronologically ordered therapeutic steps. The CPB uses the atomic recommendations issued by the guideline-based decision support system (GL-DSS) of the DESIREE project. The domain knowledge is represented as the list of all care plans that apply to breast cancer patients. Scenarios are introduced to locate the patient on these theoretical care plans. The CPB has been evaluated on a sample of 99 solved clinical cases leading to an overall performance of 89,8%.